The phrase was meant as an insult. It was delivered from a podium, in
a political speech, to describe people who considered themselves
citizens of the world. The implication was that a person who belongs
to everywhere belongs to nowhere, and therefore, to nothing.
I took the label and kept it, because I think the opposite is true.
Someone who has lived in more than one country, who has worked across
more than one language, who has built things for people who do not
look like them, is not stateless in any diminished sense. They are
simply loyal to the city and the idea rather than the flag.
This site is where I publish the work that follows from that
orientation. Indices that take metros seriously as the organising
unit of modern life. Essays on movement, measurement, and belonging.
Software that makes it easier to see the world as it actually is,
rather than as national summaries want you to see it.